Front Page arrow Opinion arrow Truth or 'Truthiness': Whatever Happened to the Facts?
asheville news
GATEWAY TO THE MULTICULTURAL COMMUNITY
Tuesday, 07 February 2012
Increasing Clouds Today: Increasing Clouds
55°F | 34°F
button.png
Truth or 'Truthiness': Whatever Happened to the Facts? E-mail

Dr. Errington Thompson

Maybe I’m wrong, but it sure seems like times have changed.

At the risk of sounding like one of those old-timers in the movie Barbershop, it seems that words like “integrity,” “honesty,” and “truth” have lost their meaning. As the two major parties clash over everything from healthcare to Afghanistan to global warming, it seems that they can’t even agree on the basic facts.

 

We see this not just in our leaders but everywhere around us. The other day when I was in my own barbershop, an older gentleman was sharing his conspiracy theories involving the government, our preachers and, well, everybody. He had a lot to say. Unfortunately, a lot of what he had to say was devoid of facts. I don’t blame him. This is the way our society has been going for the last 30 years.

“Truthiness” is a term coined by Stephen Colbert, defined as “truth that comes from the gut, not books” — in other words, stuff that we wish were true. Although “truthiness” did not start with President Ronald Reagan, he brought it to the forefront.

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, conservative columnist Ann Coulter and others have perfected this means of communication, in which you start with something that is the truth, then segue into something that is almost true, and end up with something that is completely false. To the unsuspecting observer, you made sense.

I’m not saying that either the right or the left has a monopoly on truth. Neither side does. But it does seem as if the right wing, much more than the left, tends to prefer “truthiness” over real, honest, fact-based truth.

For example, to say that the problems in the black community have been caused by the U.S. government is laughable. Government programs like welfare did not solve our problems, maybe they didn’t help the black community as planned, but they surely did not, as some claim, cause our joblessness and lack of education and our youth growing up without fathers.
Those problems did not arise with, or from, the introduction of welfare or President Johnson’s Great Society. As far back as 1897 W. E. B. DuBois, in his book The Philadelphia Negro, describes joblessness, black men fathering multiple kids, and a lack of education in the black community. The same problems we see now — and still haven’t solved – have been going on for over 100 years. But proponents of truthiness would rather blame those who try to address the problems than try to fix them.

Do you remember this past August? The right wing was pushing several items that simply weren’t true. They told us that health-care legislation included “death panels.” There was no such thing in the legislation. They told the elderly that, in order to save money, Democrats were trying to kill them off. That, too, was simply a lie.

Another of the common themes that we’ve heard over the last several years is that gay marriage will destroy the institution of marriage. I simply don’t understand this logic. I don’t know how anybody else who wants to tie the knot – a man and a woman, a woman and a woman, or a man and a man – I just don’t grasp how they’re going to affect my marriage.

Maybe it’s just me, but it seems that my marriage is mostly affected by me and my wife. I might face a higher likelihood of divorce if I forget my wife’s birthday or buy her something ill-advised like a vacuum cleaner for our anniversary, but I’m confident that our marriage won’t be in any trouble at all just because some gay couples want to wed.

Social issues aren’t the only target of truthiness. October’s economic numbers came out and showed that the economy still is not putting people back to work. Republicans have stood up and asked, “Where are the jobs?” This, too is a little gamesmanship. Last month 190,000 jobs were lost, the lowest figure since the recession started twenty-three months ago.

Now, any economist will tell you that business will need to start making money and feel good about their economic prospects before they begin hiring workers again.

The lackluster Bush recovery was driven by the housing market; the bursting of that bubble – and the collapse of construction, finance, and unlimited credit – was one of the major causes of the recession. So if people want to criticize Obama’s economic plan, they need to ask where new jobs are going to come from. They won’t come from housing, which is still depressed; they’ll have to come from Obama’s green energy initiatives and other growth fields.

I guess my point is that many people think that they know the answers to the ills of America. Most of our problems are complex and require a thoughtful solution. Anyone who gives you a knee-jerk answer to a complex question is probably leading you astray. There really are definitive truths in our society, and the world is made up not of truthiness but of empirical evidence and provable facts. We just have to be willing to find them.

  No Comments.
Discuss...
< Prev   Next >


Find us on Facebook
facebook_logo.jpg
 



RSS Feed